1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/zigzap/zap.git synced 2025-10-21 07:34:08 +00:00

fix typo in README.

This commit is contained in:
renerocksai 2025-03-30 20:03:15 +02:00
parent 3a2246ba50
commit 44ac2f2c3a
No known key found for this signature in database

View file

@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ claim any performance fame for itself. In this initial implementation of Zap,
I didn't care about optimizations at all.
But, how fast is it? Being blazingly fast is relative. When compared with a
simple GO HTTP server, a simple Zig Zap HTTP server performed really good on my
simple GO HTTP server, a simple Zig Zap HTTP server performed really well on my
machine (x86_64-linux):
- Zig Zap was nearly 30% faster than GO
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ So, being somewhere in the ballpark of basic GO performance, zig zap seems to be
I can rest my case that developing ZAP was a good idea because it's faster than
both alternatives: a) staying with Python, and b) creating a GO + Zig hybrid.
### On (now missing) Micro-Benchmakrs
### On (now missing) Micro-Benchmarks
I used to have some micro-benchmarks in this repo, showing that Zap beat all the
other things I tried, and eventually got tired of the meaningless discussions