mirror of
https://github.com/zigzap/zap.git
synced 2025-10-20 15:14:08 +00:00
49f5cd9342
In the 0.12.0 branch, [httpz](https://github.com/karlseguin/http.zig) was added to the perf measurements. Apparently, somehow this got lost, which is a pity. httpz is super-promising. Given the perf benchmarks in [this PR comment](https://github.com/antonputra/tutorials/pull/280#issuecomment-2362637299), I would have expected httpz to be on par with or better than zap in our `measure.sh` tests. However, on my M3 max mac box, I get the following: **ZAP**: ``` ➜ zap git:(reintroduce_httpz_perf) ✗ ./wrk/measure.sh zig-zap INFO: Listening on port 3000 Listening on 0.0.0.0:3000 INFO: Server is running 4 workers X 4 threads with facil.io 0.7.4 (kqueue) * Detected capacity: 131056 open file limit * Root pid: 73099 * Press ^C to stop INFO: 73110 is running. INFO: 73111 is running. INFO: 73112 is running. INFO: 73113 is running. ======================================================================== zig-zap ======================================================================== Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:3000 4 threads and 400 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 1.31ms 533.41us 18.77ms 90.57% Req/Sec 76.67k 9.04k 86.46k 84.25% Latency Distribution 50% 1.15ms 75% 1.17ms 90% 1.75ms 99% 2.94ms 3052064 requests in 10.02s, 462.80MB read Socket errors: connect 0, read 135, write 0, timeout 0 Requests/sec: 304601.19 Transfer/sec: 46.19MB ``` **httpz**: ``` ➜ zap git:(reintroduce_httpz_perf) ✗ ./wrk/measure.sh httpz ======================================================================== httpz ======================================================================== Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:3000 4 threads and 400 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 2.26ms 528.72us 18.84ms 84.61% Req/Sec 44.46k 7.35k 85.50k 88.00% Latency Distribution 50% 2.35ms 75% 2.39ms 90% 2.43ms 99% 3.26ms 1768925 requests in 10.01s, 91.10MB read Socket errors: connect 0, read 230, write 0, timeout 0 Requests/sec: 176712.50 Transfer/sec: 9.10MB ``` Which looks way off. I must admit, I might have done a bad httpz implementation. Seeking help from @karlseguin. My motivation: route people away from zap to alternatives like httpz or even zzz, as those are pure zig, and seem to be of really good performance. I want a world in which we don't have to resort to C frameworks to do good, zig-worthy servers 😄 to come true. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| axum/hello-axum | ||
| cpp | ||
| csharp | ||
| go | ||
| httpz | ||
| python | ||
| rust | ||
| samples | ||
| sanic | ||
| zig | ||
| zigstd | ||
| axum-sanic.md | ||
| graph.py | ||
| measure.sh | ||
| measure_all.sh | ||
| other_measurements.md | ||