From b993728f10c213b679def931c2f59c8e64b14660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Kelley <andrew@ziglang.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:02:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] make it a behavior test instead

It's important to check for correct runtime behavior, rather than only
checking that the compiler does not crash.
---
 test/behavior/switch_loop.zig             | 10 ++++++++++
 test/cases/discard_labeled_switch_tag.zig | 12 ------------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 test/cases/discard_labeled_switch_tag.zig

diff --git a/test/behavior/switch_loop.zig b/test/behavior/switch_loop.zig
index 687ed466d9..98605692be 100644
--- a/test/behavior/switch_loop.zig
+++ b/test/behavior/switch_loop.zig
@@ -216,3 +216,13 @@ test "switch loop with pointer capture" {
     try S.doTheTest();
     try comptime S.doTheTest();
 }
+
+test "unanalyzed continue with operand" {
+    if (builtin.zig_backend == .stage2_aarch64) return error.SkipZigTest; // TODO
+
+    @setRuntimeSafety(false);
+    label: switch (false) {
+        false => if (false) continue :label true,
+        true => {},
+    }
+}
diff --git a/test/cases/discard_labeled_switch_tag.zig b/test/cases/discard_labeled_switch_tag.zig
deleted file mode 100644
index 63aa304b40..0000000000
--- a/test/cases/discard_labeled_switch_tag.zig
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-// https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/24323
-
-export fn f() void {
-    const x: u32 = 0;
-    sw: switch (x) {
-        else => if (false) continue :sw undefined,
-    }
-}
-
-// compile
-// backend=stage2,llvm
-// target=native