This logic was previously in Sema, which was unnecessary complexity, and meant the issue was not detected unless the declaration was semantically analyzed. This commit finishes the work which 941090d started.
Resolves: #17916
Previously `@as(i64, undefined) +% 1` would produce `@as(@TypeOf(undefined), undefined)` which now gives `@as(i64, undefined)`.
Previously `@as(i64, undefined) +| 1` would hit an assertion which now gives `@as(i64, undefined)`.
This reverts commit d9d840a33a, reversing
changes made to a04d433094.
This is not an adequate implementation of the missing safety check, as
evidenced by the changes to std.json that are reverted in this commit.
Reopens#18382Closes#18510
This reverts commit f88b523065.
Let's please go through the language proposal process for this change. I
don't see any justification for this breaking change even in the commit
message.
In general, I don't like the idea of std.meta.trait, and so I am
providing some guidance by deleting the entire namespace from the
standard library and compiler codebase.
My main criticism is that it's overcomplicated machinery that bloats
compile times and is ultimately unnecessary given the existence of Zig's
strong type system and reference traces.
Users who want this can create a third party package that provides this
functionality.
closes#18051
This reverts commit 547481c31c.
There is a comment that did not get addressed with this patch, and the
required test cases are not added.
Reopens#17798.
This change allows struct field inits to use layout information
of their own struct without causing a circular dependency.
`semaStructFields` caches the ranges of the init bodies in the `StructType`
trailing data. The init bodies are then resolved by `resolveStructFieldInits`,
which is called before the inits are actually required.
Within the init bodies, the struct decl's instruction is repurposed to refer
to the field type itself. This is to allow us to easily rebuild the inst_map
mapping required for the init body instructions to refer to the field type.
Thanks to @mlugg for the guidance on this one!
