The last Intel Quark MCU was released in 2015. Quark was announced to be EOL in
2019, and stopped shipping entirely in 2022.
The OS tag was only meaningful for Intel's weird fork of Linux 3.8.7 with a
special ABI that differs from the regular i386 System V ABI; beyond that, the
CPU itself is just a plain old P54C (i586). We of course keep support for the
CPU itself, just not Intel's Linux fork.
Aside from adding comments to document the logic in `Cache.Manifest.hit`
better, this commit fixes two serious bugs.
The first, spotted by Andrew, is that when upgrading from a shared to an
exclusive lock on the manifest file, we do not seek it back to the
start. This is a simple fix.
The second is more subtle, and has to do with the computation of file
digests. Broadly speaking, the goal of the main loop in `hit` is to
iterate the files listed in the manifest file, and check if they've
changed, based on stat and a file hash. While doing this, the
`bin_digest` field of `std.Build.Cache.File`, which is initially
`undefined`, is populated for all files, either straight from the
manifest (if the stat matches) or recomputed from the file on-disk. This
file digest is then used to update `man.hash.hasher`, which is building
the final hash used as, for instance, the output directory name when the
compiler emits into the cache directory. When `hit` returns a cache
miss, it is expected that `man.hash.hasher` includes the digests of all
"initial files"; that is, those which have been already added with e.g.
`addFilePath`, but not those which will later be added with
`addFilePost` (even though the manifest file has told us about some such
files). Previously, `hit` was using the `unhit` function to do this in a
few cases. However, this is incorrect, because `hit` assumes that all
files already have their `bin_digest` field populated; this function is
only valid to call *after* `hit` returns. Instead, we need to actually
compute the hashes which haven't yet been populated. Even if this logic
has been working, there was still a bug here, because we called `unhit`
when upgrading from a shared to an exclusive lock, writing the
(potentially `undefined`) file digests, but the loop itself writes the
file digests *again*! All in all, the hashing logic here was actually
incredibly broken.
I've taken the opportunity to restructure this section of the code into
what I think is a more readable format. A new function,
`hitWithCurrentLock`, uses the open manifest file to try and find a
cache hit. It returns a tagged union which, in the miss case, tells the
caller (`hit`) how many files already have their hash populated. This
avoids redundant work recomputing the same hash multiple times in
situations where the lock needs upgrading. This also eliminates the
outer loop from `hit`, which was a little confusing because it iterated
no more than twice!
The bugs fixed here could manifest in several different ways depending
on how contended file locks were satisfied. Most notably, on a cache
miss, the Zig compiler might have written the compilation output to the
incorrect directory (because it incorrectly constructed a hash using
`undefined` or repeated file digests), resulting in all future hits on
this manifest causing `error.FileNotFound`. This is #23110. I have been
able to reproduce #23110 on `master`, and have not been able to after
this commit, so I am relatively sure this commit resolves that issue.
Resolves: #23110
* Accept -fsanitize-c=trap|full in addition to the existing form.
* Accept -f(no-)sanitize-trap=undefined in zig cc.
* Change type of std.Build.Module.sanitize_c to std.zig.SanitizeC.
* Add some missing Compilation.Config fields to the cache.
Closes#23216.
* This has not seen meaningful development for about a decade.
* The Linux kernel port was never upstreamed.
* The glibc port was never upstreamed.
* GCC 15.1 recently deprecated support it.
It may still make sense to support an ILP32 ABI on AArch64 more broadly (which
we already have the Abi.ilp32 tag for), but, to the extent that it even existed
in any "official" sense, the *GNU* ILP32 ABI is certainly dead.
This is fairly straightforward; the actual compiler changes are limited
to the CLI, since `Compilation` already supports this combination.
A new `std.Build` API is introduced to allow representing this. By
passing the `emit_object` option to `std.Build.addTest`, you get a
`Step.Compile` which emits an object file; you can then use that as you
would any other object, such as either installing it for external use,
or linking it into another step.
A standalone test is added to cover the build system API. It builds a
test into an object, and links it into a final executable, which it then
runs.
Using this build system mechanism prevents the build system from
noticing that you're running a `zig test`, so the build runner and test
runner do not communicate over stdio. However, that's okay, because the
real-world use cases for this feature don't want to do that anyway!
Resolves: #23374
* Fix compile error in Fuzzer web-ui
The error was:
```
error: expected type '?mem.Alignment', found 'comptime_int'
```
* Apply suggestions from code review
`.of` call is shorter and clearer
Co-authored-by: Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com>
std.crypto: add constant-time codecs
Add constant-time hex/base64 codecs designed to process cryptographic
secrets, adapted from libsodium's implementations.
Introduce a `crypto.codecs` namespace for crypto-related encoders and
decoders. Move ASN.1 codecs to this namespace.
This will also naturally accommodate the proposed PEM codecs.
This lays the groundwork for #2879. This library will be built and linked when a
static libc is going to be linked into the compilation. Currently, that means
musl, wasi-libc, and MinGW-w64. As a demonstration, this commit removes the musl
C code for a few string functions and implements them in libzigc. This means
that those libzigc functions are now load-bearing for musl and wasi-libc.
Note that if a function has an implementation in compiler-rt already, libzigc
should not implement it. Instead, as we recently did for memcpy/memmove, we
should delete the libc copy and rely on the compiler-rt implementation.
I repurposed the existing "universal libc" code to do this. That code hadn't
seen development beyond basic string functions in years, and was only usable-ish
on freestanding. I think that if we want to seriously pursue the idea of Zig
providing a freestanding libc, we should do so only after defining clear goals
(and non-goals) for it. See also #22240 for a similar case.
