This experimental target was never fully completed. The operating system
is not that interesting or popular anyway, and the maintainer is no
longer around.
Not worth the maintenance burden. This code can be resurrected later if
it is worth it. In such case it will be subject to greater scrutiny.
This is one way of partially addressing https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/24767
- These functions are unused
- These functions are untested
- These functions are broken
+ The same dangling pointer bug from 6219c015d8 exists in `writePreserve`
+ The order of the bytes preserved in relation to the `bytes` being written can differ depending on unused buffer capacity at the time of the call and the drain implementation.
If there ends up being a need for these functions, they can be fixed and added back.
This commit re-enables the --webui functionality on windows, with the caveat that rebuild functionality is still disabled (due to deadlocks caused by reading to / writing from the same non-overlapped socket on multiple threads). I updated the UI to be aware of this, and hide the `Rebuild` button.
http.Server: Remove incorrect advance() call. This was causing browsers to disconnect the websocket, as we were sending undefined bytes.
build.WebServer: Re-enable on windows, but disable functionality that requires receiving messages from the client
build-web: Show total times in tables
The "completed" count in the "Semantic Analysis" progress node had
regressed since 0.14.0: the number got crazy big very fast, even on
simple cases. For instance, an empty `pub fn main` got to ~59,000 where
on 0.14 it only reached ~4,000. This was happening because I was
unintentionally introducing a node every time type resolution was
*requested*, even if (as is usually the case) it turned out to already
be done. The fix is simply to start the progress node a little later,
once we know we are actually doing semantic analysis. This brings the
number for that empty test case down to ~5,000, which makes perfect
sense. It won't exactly match 0.14, because the standard library has
changed, and also because the compiler's progress output does have some
*intentional* changes.
The functions `Compilation.create` and `Compilation.update` previously
returned inferred error sets, which had built up a lot of crap over
time. This meant that certain error conditions -- particularly certain
filesystem errors -- were not being reported properly (at best the CLI
would just print the error name). This was also a problem in
sub-compilations, where at times only the error name -- which might just
be something like `LinkFailed` -- would be visible.
This commit makes the error handling here more disciplined by
introducing concrete error sets to these functions (and a few more as a
consequence). These error sets are small: errors in `update` are almost
all reported via compile errors, and errors in `create` are reported
through a new `Compilation.CreateDiagnostic` type, a tagged union of
possible error cases. This allows for better error reporting.
Sub-compilations also report errors more correctly in several cases,
leading to more informative errors in the case of compiler bugs.
Also fixes some race conditions in library building by replacing calls
to `setMiscFailure` with calls to `lockAndSetMiscFailure`. Compilation
of libraries such as libc happens on the thread pool, so the logic must
synchronize its access to shared `Compilation` state.
While underlying writer is Allocating writer buffer can grow in
vtable.drain call. We should not hold pointer to the buffer before that
call and use it after.
This remembers positions instead of holding reference.
Running tar.pipeToFileSystem compressed_mingw_includes.tar file from #24732
finishes in infinite loop calling defaultReadVec with:
r.seek = 1024
r.end = 1024
r.buffer.len = 1024
first.len = 512
that combination calls vtable.stream with 0 capacity writer and loops
forever.
Comment is to use whichever has larger capacity, and this fix reflects that.
This way, if the ci-riscv64-linux label was added to a PR previously, removing
it will cause the concurrency group of the workflow to cancel the runs triggered
by the label being added.
It's a bit counter-intuitive, but there are two streams here: the
implementation here, and the connected output stream.
When we say "unflushed" we mean don't flush the connected output stream
because that's managed externally. But an "end" operation should always
flush the implementation stream.
