Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Rønne Petersen
c8ca05e93a
std.Target: Remove sparcel architecture tag.
What is `sparcel`, you might ask? Good question!

If you take a peek in the SPARC v8 manual, §2.2, it is quite explicit that SPARC
v8 is a big-endian architecture. No little-endian or mixed-endian support to be
found here.

On the other hand, the SPARC v9 manual, in §3.2.1.2, states that it has support
for mixed-endian operation, with big-endian mode being the default.

Ok, so `sparcel` must just be referring to SPARC v9 running in little-endian
mode, surely?

Nope:

* 40b4fd7a3e/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcTargetMachine.cpp (L226)
* 40b4fd7a3e/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcTargetMachine.cpp (L104)

So, `sparcel` in LLVM is referring to some sort of fantastical little-endian
SPARC v8 architecture. I've scoured the internet and I can find absolutely no
evidence that such a thing exists or has ever existed. In fact, I can find no
evidence that a little-endian implementation of SPARC v9 ever existed, either.
Or any SPARC version, actually!

The support was added here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D8741

Notably, there is no mention whatsoever of what CPU this might be referring to,
and no justification given for the "but some are little" comment added in the
patch.

My best guess is that this might have been some private exercise in creating a
little-endian version of SPARC that never saw the light of day. Given that SPARC
v8 explicitly doesn't support little-endian operation (let alone little-endian
instruction encoding!), and no CPU is known to be implemented as such, I think
it's very reasonable for us to just remove this support.
2024-07-30 06:30:25 +02:00
Alex Rønne Petersen
d1d95294fd std.Target.Cpu.Arch: Remove the aarch64_32 tag.
This is a misfeature that we inherited from LLVM:

* https://reviews.llvm.org/D61259
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D61939

(`aarch64_32` and `arm64_32` are equivalent.)

I truly have no idea why this triple passed review in LLVM. It is, to date, the
*only* tag in the architecture component that is not, in fact, an architecture.
In reality, it is just an ILP32 ABI for AArch64 (*not* AArch32).

The triples that use `aarch64_32` look like `aarch64_32-apple-watchos`. Yes,
that triple is exactly what you think; it has no ABI component. They really,
seriously did this.

Since only Apple could come up with silliness like this, it should come as no
surprise that no one else uses `aarch64_32`. Later on, a GNU ILP32 ABI for
AArch64 was developed, and support was added to LLVM:

* https://reviews.llvm.org/D94143
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D104931

Here, sanity seems to have prevailed, and a triple using this ABI looks like
`aarch64-linux-gnu_ilp32` as you would expect.

As can be seen from the diffs in this commit, there was plenty of confusion
throughout the Zig codebase about what exactly `aarch64_32` was. So let's just
remove it. In its place, we'll use `aarch64-watchos-ilp32`,
`aarch64-linux-gnuilp32`, and so on. We'll then translate these appropriately
when talking to LLVM. Hence, this commit adds the `ilp32` ABI tag (we already
have `gnuilp32`).
2024-07-28 19:44:52 -07:00
Alex Rønne Petersen
c825b567b2
std.Target: Remove the r600 arch tag.
These are quite old GPUs, and it is unlikely that Zig will ever be able to
target them.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_HD_2000_series
2024-07-21 22:38:30 +02:00
Jakub Konka
47e840a9b9 test/llvm_targets: add watchos, tvos and visionos to test matrix 2024-05-09 22:19:45 +02:00
Andrew Kelley
3179f58c41 rename std.zig.CrossTarget to std.Target.Query 2024-01-01 17:51:18 -07:00
Andrew Kelley
142471fcc4 zig build system: change target, compilation, and module APIs
Introduce the concept of "target query" and "resolved target". A target
query is what the user specifies, with some things left to default. A
resolved target has the default things discovered and populated.
In the future, std.zig.CrossTarget will be rename to std.Target.Query.
Introduces `std.Build.resolveTargetQuery` to get from one to the other.

The concept of `main_mod_path` is gone, no longer supported. You have to
put the root source file at the module root now.

* remove deprecated API
* update build.zig for the breaking API changes in this branch
* move std.Build.Step.Compile.BuildId to std.zig.BuildId
* add more options to std.Build.ExecutableOptions, std.Build.ObjectOptions,
  std.Build.SharedLibraryOptions, std.Build.StaticLibraryOptions, and
  std.Build.TestOptions.
* remove `std.Build.constructCMacro`. There is no use for this API.
* deprecate `std.Build.Step.Compile.defineCMacro`. Instead,
  `std.Build.Module.addCMacro` is provided.
  - remove `std.Build.Step.Compile.defineCMacroRaw`.
* deprecate `std.Build.Step.Compile.linkFrameworkNeeded`
  - use `std.Build.Module.linkFramework`
* deprecate `std.Build.Step.Compile.linkFrameworkWeak`
  - use `std.Build.Module.linkFramework`
* move more logic into `std.Build.Module`
* allow `target` and `optimize` to be `null` when creating a Module.
  Along with other fields, those unspecified options will be inherited
  from parent `Module` when inserted into an import table.
* the `target` field of `addExecutable` is now required. pass `b.host`
  to get the host target.
2024-01-01 17:51:18 -07:00
Jacob Young
9e0a34f329 llvm: fix data layout calculation for experimental llvm targets
Closes #16616
2023-08-01 19:20:22 -07:00
Jacob Young
f9717f87f5 llvm: fix data layout on ios
Closes #16549
2023-07-26 16:49:32 -07:00
Jacob Young
c610cde1eb test: test for issues starting codegen on many targets
Specifically this is to make sure llvm data layout generation doesn't
regress.  The no emit bin is to allow testing targets that can't
currently be linked.  The commented out targets are ones that fail in
the linker anyway when no emit bin is passed.
2023-07-23 23:48:19 -04:00