Instead of hardcoding a call to defaultRandomSeed() use the customizable
std.options.cryptoRandomSeed() like in the rest of the function.
Closes#19943.
In #22522 I said:
> RC="zig rc" will now work in combination with zig cc and CMake. Here's an example of cross-compiling a simple Windows GUI CMake project
>
> $ RC="zig rc" CC="zig cc --target=x86_64-windows-gnu" cmake .. -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Windows -G Ninja
However, I didn't realize that the time that this only works because of the `-G Ninja` part. When not using Ninja as the build tool, CMake adds a workaround for 'very long lists of object files' where it takes all object files and runs them through `ar` to combine them into one archive:
4a11fd8dde/Modules/Platform/Windows-GNU.cmake (L141-L158)
This is a problem for the Windows resource use-case, because `ar` doesn't know how to deal with `.res` files and so this object combining step fails with:
unknown file type: foo.rc.res
Only the linker knows what to do with .res files (since it has its own `.res` -> `.obj` ('cvtres') conversion mechanism). So, when using Ninja, this object file combining step is skipped and the .res file gets passed to the linker and everyone is happy.
Note: When CMake thinks that its using `windres` as the Windows resource compiler, it will pass `-O coff` to windres which causes it to output a COFF object file instead of a `.res` file, which means that the `ar` step can succeed because it's only working on actual object files.
---
This commit gives `zig rc` the ability to output COFF object files directly when `/:output-format coff` is provided as an argument. This effectively matches what happens when CMake uses `windres` for resource compilation, but requires the argument to be provided explicitly.
So, after this change, the following CMake cross-compilation use case will work, even when not using Ninja as the generator:
RC="zig rc /:output-format coff" CC="zig cc --target=x86_64-windows-gnu" cmake .. -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Windows
These were previously incremental tests, so weren't running. They didn't
*need* to be incremental. They worked under the old runner because of
how it directly integrated with the compiler so tracked error messages
differently.
Updated solution is future proof for arbitary size integer handling for both strategies .br_table lowering if switch case is dense, .br_if base jump table if values are too sparse.
