Ran into this when using a program that uses CreateFileMapping and then trying to call `std.fs.createFile` on the mapped file. More info can be found here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41844842/when-error-1224-error-user-mapped-file-occurs
Before:
```
error.Unexpected NTSTATUS=0xc0000243
C:\Users\Ryan\Programming\Zig\zig\lib\std\os\windows.zig:138:40: 0x7ff74e957466 in OpenFile (test.exe.obj)
else => return unexpectedStatus(rc),
^
```
After:
```
FAIL (AccessDenied)
C:\Users\Ryan\Programming\Zig\zig\lib\std\os\windows.zig:137:30: 0x7ff7f5b776ea in OpenFile (test.exe.obj)
.USER_MAPPED_FILE => return error.AccessDenied,
^
```
Test coverage was lacking for chdir() on WASI, allowing this to
regress.
This change makes os.chdir() compile again, and improves the test
logic to use our standard CWD support for WASI.
- the meaning of packed structs changed in zig 0.10. adjust accordingly.
Use "extern struct" for the cases that directly map to C structs.
- Add new type info kinds, like enum64 and DeclTag
- change the Type enum to use the canonical names from libbpf.
This is more predictable when comparing with external BPF
documentation (than invented synonyms that need to be guessed)
* std.os.uefi: integer backed structs, add tests to catch regressions
device_path_protocol now uses extern structs with align(1) fields because
the transition to integer backed packed struct broke alignment
added comptime asserts that device_path_protocol structs do not violate
alignment and size specifications
This makes possible to query the memory map size from EFI firmware
without making any allocation beforehand. This makes possible to be
precise about the size of the allocation which will own a copy of
the memory map from the UEFI application.
- For ALU operations, src should be allowed to be an explicit Reg.
- Expose AluOp and JmpOp as public types.
This makes code generation using BPF as a backend easier,
as AluOp and JmpOp can be used directly as part of an IR
The definition of HKEY__ as a struct with an unused int field is only the case in the Windows headers when `STRICT` is defined. From https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/winprog/enabling-strict:
> When STRICT is defined, data type definitions change as follows:
>
> - Specific handle types are defined to be mutually exclusive; for example, you will not be able to pass an HWND where an HDC type argument is required. Without STRICT, all handles are defined as HANDLE, so the compiler does not prevent you from using one type of handle where another type is expected.
Zig's `opaque {}` already gives this benefit to us, so the usage of a struct with an unused field is unnecessary, and it was causing HKEY to have an alignment of 4, which is a problem because there are HKEY constants like HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (0x80000002) that are not 4-byte aligned. Without this change, the compiler would not allow something like HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE to be defined since it enforces pointer alignment.
This implements the new addition to the API: `sock_accept`.
Reference commit of WASI spec:
0ba0c5e2e37625ca5a6d3e4255a998dfaa3efc52
For full details:
0ba0c5e2e3
For entire spec at this commit:
0ba0c5e2e3/phases/snapshot/docs.md
POSIX specifies that the sa_handler field of the sigaction struct may
be set to SIG_IGN or SIG_DFL. However, the current constants in the
standard library use the function pointer signature corresponding to
the sa_sigaction field instead.
This may not cause issues in practice because the fields usually occupy
the same memory in a union, but this isn't required by POSIX and there
may be systems we do not yet support that do this differently.
Fixing this also makes the Zig interface less confusing to use after
reading the man page.
From https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/inotify.7.html
> **IN_MASK_CREATE** (since Linux 4.18)
>
> Watch pathname only if it does not already have a watch associated with it; the error EEXIST results if pathname is already being watched.
When lowering a struct type to an LLVM struct type, keep track of
whether there are any underaligned fields. If so, then make it a packed
llvm struct. This works because we already insert manual padding bytes
regardless.
We could unconditionally use an LLVM packed struct; the reason we bother
checking for underaligned fields is that it is a conservative choice, in
case LLVM handles packed structs less optimally. A future improvement
could simplify this code by unconditionally using packed LLVM structs
and then make sure measure perf is unaffected.
closes#12190
