The ABIs do not define a frame pointer register, nor do they define a guaranteed
and fixed area on the stack where one might find saved registers such as a frame
pointer or return address.
The compile-time check against the minimum version here wasn't appropriate, since it still makes sense to try using FILE_RENAME_INFORMATION_EX even if the minimum version is something like `xp`, since that doesn't rule out the possibility of the compiled code running on Windows 10/11. This compile-time check was doubly bad since the default minimum windows version (`.win10`) was below the `.win10_rs5` that was checked for, so when providing a target like `x86_64-windows-gnu` it'd always rule out using this syscall.
After this commit, we always try using FILE_RENAME_INFORMATION_EX and then let the operating system tell us when some aspect of it is not supported. This allows us to get the benefits of these new syscalls/flags whenever it's actually possible.
The possible error returns were validated experimentally:
- INVALID_PARAMETER is returned when the underlying filesystem is FAT32
- INVALID_INFO_CLASS is returned on Windows 7 when trying to use FileRenameInformationEx/FileDispositionInformationEx
- NOT_SUPPORTED is returned on Windows 10 >= .win10_rs5 when setting a bogus flag value (I used `0x1000`)
This is very likely full of wrong stuff. It's effectively just a copy of the
x86_64 file - needed because the former stopped using usize/isize. To be clear,
this is no more broken than the old situation was; this just makes the
brokenness explicit.
This is very likely full of wrong stuff. It's effectively just a copy of the
mips64 file - needed because the former stopped using usize/isize. To be clear,
this is no more broken than the old situation was; this just makes the
brokenness explicit.
This is a rewrite of the BLAKE3 implementation, with vectorization.
On Apple Silicon, the new implementation is about twice as fast as the previous one.
With AVX2, it is more than 4 times faster.
With AVX512, it is more than 7.5x faster than the previous implementation (from 678 MB/s to 5086 MB/s).
The return address points to the call instruction on SPARC, so the actual return
address is 8 bytes after. This means that we shouldn't do the return address
adjustment that we normally do.
The FP would point to the register save area for the previous frame, while the
SP points to the register save area for the current frame. So use the latter.
I have no idea if this is a QEMU bug or real kernel behavior. Either way, the
register save area specifically exists for asynchronous spilling of incoming and
local registers, so there should be no harm in doing this.
* std.crypto: add AES-CCM and CBC-MAC
Add AES-CCM (Counter with CBC-MAC) authenticated encryption and
CBC-MAC message authentication code implementations to the standard
library.
AES-CCM combines CTR mode encryption with CBC-MAC authentication as
specified in NIST SP 800-38C and RFC 3610. It provides authenticated
encryption with support for additional authenticated data (AAD).
CBC-MAC is a simple MAC construction used internally by CCM, specified
in FIPS 113 and ISO/IEC 9797-1.
Includes comprehensive test vectors from RFC 3610 and NIST SP 800-38C.
* std.crypto: add CCM* (encryption-only) support to AES-CCM
Implements CCM* mode per IEEE 802.15.4 specification, extending
AES-CCM to support encryption-only mode when tag_len=0. This is
required by protocols like ZigBee, Thread, and WirelessHART.
Changes:
- Allow tag_len=0 for encryption-only mode (no authentication)
- Skip CBC-MAC computation when tag_len=0 in encrypt/decrypt
- Correctly encode M'=0 in B0 block for CCM* mode
- Add Aes128Ccm0 and Aes256Ccm0 convenience instances
- Add IEEE 802.15.4 test vectors and CCM* tests
* std.crypto: add doc comments for AES-CCM variants
If these ever get allocated, it's most likely going to be for things that don't
matter to us anyway, so completely abandoning DWARF unwinding just because we
see these doesn't seem justified. We will still do so if we're actually asked to
read from such a register, which is the only actually problematic case; see
c23a5ccd19 for more details.
