This commit reworks how Sema handles arithmetic on comptime-known
values, fixing many bugs in the process.
The general pattern is that arithmetic on comptime-known values is now
handled by the new namespace `Sema.arith`. Functions handling comptime
arithmetic no longer live on `Value`; this is because some of them can
emit compile errors, so some *can't* go on `Value`. Only semantic
analysis should really be doing arithmetic on `Value`s anyway, so it
makes sense for it to integrate more tightly with `Sema`.
This commit also implements more coherent rules surrounding how
`undefined` interacts with comptime and mixed-comptime-runtime
arithmetic. The rules are as follows.
* If an operation cannot trigger Illegal Behavior, and any operand is
`undefined`, the result is `undefined`. This includes operations like
`0 *| undef`, where the LHS logically *could* be used to determine a
defined result. This is partly to simplify the language, but mostly to
permit codegen backends to represent `undefined` values as completely
invalid states.
* If an operation *can* trigger Illegal Behvaior, and any operand is
`undefined`, then Illegal Behavior results. This occurs even if the
operand in question isn't the one that "decides" illegal behavior; for
instance, `undef / 1` is undefined. This is for the same reasons as
described above.
* An operation which would trigger Illegal Behavior, when evaluated at
comptime, instead triggers a compile error. Additionally, if one
operand is comptime-known undef, such that the other (runtime-known)
operand isn't needed to determine that Illegal Behavior would occur,
the compile error is triggered.
* The only situation in which an operation with one comptime-known
operand has a comptime-known result is if that operand is undefined,
in which case the result is either undefined or a compile error per
the above rules. This could potentially be loosened in future (for
instance, `0 * rt` could be comptime-known 0 with a runtime assertion
that `rt` is not undefined), but at least for now, defining it more
conservatively simplifies the language and allows us to easily change
this in future if desired.
This commit fixes many bugs regarding the handling of `undefined`,
particularly in vectors. Along with a collection of smaller tests, two
very large test cases are added to check arithmetic on `undefined`.
The operations which have been rewritten in this PR are:
* `+`, `+%`, `+|`, `@addWithOverflow`
* `-`, `-%`, `-|`, `@subWithOverflow`
* `*`, `*%`, `*|`, `@mulWithOverflow`
* `/`, `@divFloor`, `@divTrunc`, `@divExact`
* `%`, `@rem`, `@mod`
Other arithmetic operations are currently unchanged.
Resolves: #22743Resolves: #22745Resolves: #22748Resolves: #22749Resolves: #22914
Simliarly to shl_with_overflow, we first SHL/SAL the integer, then
SHR/SAR it back to compare if overflow happens.
If overflow happened, set result to the upper limit to make it saturating.
Bug: #17645
Co-authored-by: Jacob Young <jacobly0@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Bingwu Zhang <xtex@aosc.io>
Updated solution is future proof for arbitary size integer handling for both strategies .br_table lowering if switch case is dense, .br_if base jump table if values are too sparse.
Functions like isMinGW() and isGnuLibC() have a good reason to exist: They look
at multiple components of the target. But functions like isWasm(), isDarwin(),
isGnu(), etc only exist to save 4-8 characters. I don't think this is a good
enough reason to keep them, especially given that:
* It's not immediately obvious to a reader whether target.isDarwin() means the
same thing as target.os.tag.isDarwin() precisely because isMinGW() and similar
functions *do* look at multiple components.
* It's not clear where we would draw the line. The logical conclusion before
this commit would be to also wrap Arch.isX86(), Os.Tag.isSolarish(),
Abi.isOpenHarmony(), etc... this obviously quickly gets out of hand.
* It's nice to just have a single correct way of doing something.
