As with Solaris (dba1bf9353), we have no way to
actually audit contributions for these OSs. IBM also makes it even harder than
Oracle to actually obtain these OSs.
closes#23695closes#23694closes#3655closes#23693
There is no straightforward way for the Zig team to access the Solaris system
headers; to do this, one has to create an Oracle account, accept their EULA to
download the installer ISO, and finally install it on a machine or VM. We do not
have to jump through hoops like this for any other OS that we support, and no
one on the team has expressed willingness to do it.
As a result, we cannot audit any Solaris contributions to std.c or other
similarly sensitive parts of the standard library. The best we would be able to
do is assume that Solaris and illumos are 100% compatible with no way to verify
that assumption. But at that point, the solaris and illumos OS tags would be
functionally identical anyway.
For Solaris especially, any contributions that involve APIs introduced after the
OS was made closed-source would also be inherently more risky than equivalent
contributions for other proprietary OSs due to the case of Google LLC v. Oracle
America, Inc., wherein Oracle clearly demonstrated its willingness to pursue
legal action against entities that merely copy API declarations.
Finally, Oracle laid off most of the Solaris team in 2017; the OS has been in
maintenance mode since, presumably to be retired completely sometime in the 2030s.
For these reasons, this commit removes all Oracle Solaris support.
Anyone who still wishes to use Zig on Solaris can try their luck by simply using
illumos instead of solaris in target triples - chances are it'll work. But there
will be no effort from the Zig team to support this use case; we recommend that
people move to illumos instead.
* ELF v1 on powerpc64 is only barely kept on life support in a couple of Linux
distros. I don't anticipate that this will last much longer.
* Most of the Linux world has moved to powerpc64le which requires ELF v2.
* Some Linux distros have even started supporting powerpc64 with ELF v2.
* The BSD world has long since moved to ELF v2.
* We have no actual linking support for ELF v1.
* ELF v1 had confused DWARF register mappings which is becoming a problem in
our DWARF code in std.debug.
It's clear that ELF v1 is on its way out, and we never fully supported it
anyway. So let's not waste any time or energy on it going forward.
closes#5927
The amount of cross compilation required for these tests was too time-consuming
for how much value they added. test-stack-traces now cover these well enough,
especially as we add more exotic machines to the CI fleet to run native tests.
There were only a few dozen lines of common logic, and they frankly
introduced more complexity than they eliminated. Instead, let's accept
that the implementations of `SelfInfo` are all pretty different and want
to track different state. This probably fixes some synchronization and
memory bugs by simplifying a bunch of stuff. It also improves the DWARF
unwind cache, making it around twice as fast in a debug build with the
self-hosted x86_64 backend, because we no longer have to redundantly go
through the hashmap lookup logic to find the module. Unwinding on
Windows will also see a slight performance boost from this change,
because `RtlVirtualUnwind` does not need to know the module whatsoever,
so the old `SelfInfo` implementation was doing redundant work. Lastly,
this makes it even easier to implement `SelfInfo` on freestanding
targets; there is no longer a need to emulate a real module system,
since the user controls the whole implementation!
There are various other small refactors here in the `SelfInfo`
implementations as well as in the DWARF unwinding logic. This change
turned out to make a lot of stuff simpler!
...and just deal with signal handlers by adding 1 to create a fake
"return address". The system I tried out where the addresses returned by
`StackIterator` were pre-subtracted didn't play nicely with error
traces, which in hindsight, makes perfect sense. This definition also
removes some ugly off-by-one issues in matching `first_address`, so I do
think this is a better approach.
